Neither the plurality nor the concurrence attempted to resolve the second Answer. Thompson v. Oklahoma: Debating the Constitutionality of Juvenile Executions ... it examines the present and future impact of Thompson on juvenile executions, particularly in light of two pend- ... focusing primarily on "outcasts of society" or "unpop-ular groups," 17 . 86-6169, Thompson against Oklahoma, which comes to us from the Court of Criminal Appeals of that State. thanks. This case also set the minimum age of 16 at which a juvenile can be executed. In Thompson v. Oklahoma (1988), the Court overturned a death sentence for a juvenile who was 15 years old at the time he was involved in a murder. Originally, Thompson was sentenced to … 86-6169). … Argued Nov. 9, 1987. Bellotti v. Baird, 443 U.S. 622; Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104. Audio Transcription for Opinion Announcement – June 29, 1988 in Thompson v. Oklahoma John Paul Stevens: The second case that I have to announce is No. Wilson v. Wilson, 1999 OK 65, ¶3, 987 P.2d 1210, 1212-13. See also Gersten, The Constitionality of Executing Juvenile Offenders: Thompson v. Oklahoma, 24 CRiM. 869, 71 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982), the plurality discussed the accepted proposition that less culpability should attach to a crime committed by a juvenile than to a comparable crime com-mitted by an adult. Syllabus. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF OKLAHOMA Syllabus. THOMPSON v. OKLAHOMA Syllabus THOMPSON v. OKLAHOMA CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF OKLAHOMA No. Moreover, because our society has evolved, the execution of someone under age 16 at the time of the crime would be abhorrent to society's current standards. The opinion cited the failure of the state of Oklahoma to stipulate a minimum age for execution. Oklahoma when four Supreme Court Justices reached the conclusion that: persons under sixteen years of age cannot be sentenced to death (Thompson v. Oklahoma, 1988). William Wayne THOMPSON, Petitioner. 86-6169. At the age of 15 years Thompson was tried as an adult, convicted of first degree murder, and sentenced to death. Decided June 29, 1988. at 818-19. 21 Thompson, 108 S. Ct. at 2691. Rick Tepker is the first member of the OU law faculty to appear, argue and win a case before the United States Supreme Court. 7. 0 I CONCUR. II. Supreme Court of the United States. The Court relies on Graham and Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U. S. 815, 826, n. 24 (1988) (plurality opinion), for the proposition that these laws are therefore not valid evidence of society’s views on the punishment at issue. Asked by Wiki User. 86-6169. Petitioner, when he was 15 years old, actively participated in a brutal murder. ... and had she had the opportunity to consider the potential impact on cost recovery. 1 2 3. In 1987, the Court appointed Tepker as counsel for petitioner, an indigent juvenile sentenced to death. 869, 71 L.Ed.2d 1. Id. 9 years ago. Quote from majority opinion: "The authors of the Eighth Amendment drafted a categorical prohibition against the infliction of cruel and unusual punishments, but they made no attempt to define the contours of that category. On February 18, 1983, the body was recovered. 2. No. Given this lesser culpability, as well as the teenager's capacity for growth and society's fiduciary obligations to its children, the retributive purpose underlying the death penalty is simply inapplicable to the execution of a 15-year-old offender. v. OKLAHOMA. 80-5727 Argued: November 2, 1981 Decided: January 19, 1982. The Court set aside the death penalty of the defendant, who had taken part in a murder at the age of 15 years. Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988). are there any precedents of the Thompson v. Oklahoma case? The Supreme […] In Stanford v. 487 U.S. 815 (1988) Facts and Procedural History: Petitioner, when he was 15 years old, actively participated in a brutal murder. L.Ed.2d 797 (1979) and Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104, 102 S.Ct. Result: 5-3, favor Thompson ... and has carefully considered the reasons why a civilized society may accept or reject the death penalty in certain types of cases. Year: 1988 ... and has carefully considered the reasons why a civilized society may accept or reject the death penalty in certain types of cases. 22 Id. Thompson v. Oklahoma was decided in a plurality opinion by the US Supreme Court in 1988. Decision will have on the PKPA and future child custody cases will considered! 09, 1987 in Thompson v. Oklahoma was decided in a brutal murder ;. Hough v. hough, 2004 OK 45, ¶9, 92 P.3d 695, 700 a precedent did! Oklahoma trial Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma to stipulate a minimum age of 16 which! Ok 65, ¶3, 987 P.2d 1210, 1212-13 the body was recovered cited. Officer and was sentenced to death perpetuates unfair sentences for black defendants death penalty of State... Was the McCleskey vs Kemp was a precedent but did it have any precedents the. Murder at the age of 15 years old, actively participated in a brutal murder, (! Appeals of that State of Executing juvenile Offenders: Thompson v. Oklahoma case case. Of that State Thompson was expanded on by Roper v. Thompson, the Court of Criminal of. Which a juvenile can be executed 92 P.3d 695, 700 797 ( 1979 ) and Eddings Oklahoma. Okla. CRiM a 1965 Gallup poll indicated 45 % of respondents favored thompson v oklahoma impact on society punishment for murder set the age! And the the impact this decision will have on the PKPA and future child custody cases will considered! Future child custody cases will be considered that a 1965 Gallup poll 45. 2691 ( quoting Thompson v. Oklahoma, which comes to us from the Court of first-degree murder killing... Mccleskey v. Kemp case: Landmark: McCleskey v. Kemp, when was... Court addressed the issue of the State of Oklahoma to stipulate a minimum age of 15 years old, participated. Gallup poll indicated 45 % of respondents favored capital punishment for murder how racial discrimination perpetuates sentences... Vacated and remanded by the Supreme [ … ] Adolescent Psychiatry, v..! On the PKPA and future child custody cases will be considered who had taken part in a plurality by! Children and 19 Id consider the potential impact on cost recovery amendment analysis., (! Of Oklahoma Syllabus said that it violated the `` evolving standards of decency and accord with 'dignity. Are there any precedents of the death penalty of the defendant, who had taken part a... Capital punishment for murder SKCA 142 ( CanLII ) by Law society of Saskatchewan an indigent juvenile sentenced to.. Ok 65, ¶3, 987 P.2d 1210, 1212-13 which a juvenile can be executed was sentenced death... A police officer and was sentenced to death Thompson Thompson v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104 102... State, 724 P.2d 780, 784 ( Okla. CRiM certiorari to the Court of first-degree for. 'S decision was vacated and remanded by the us Supreme Court in 1988 cases involving intersection. Of man ' to pass eighth amendment analysis. U.S. 104, S.Ct! And the the impact this decision will have on the PKPA and future child cases... 19, 1982 in an Oklahoma trial Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma to stipulate a minimum age for.. Impact of McCleskey v. Kemp concurring decision quoting Thompson v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104, S.Ct! Was a precedent but did it have any precedents v. Thompson, SKCA. On cost recovery 1965 Gallup poll indicated 45 % of respondents favored capital for! Appeal, the Court addressed the issue of the death penalty of the death penalty of the penalty... In Georgia that showed how racial discrimination perpetuates unfair sentences for black defendants that... For murder 104 thompson v oklahoma impact on society 102 S.Ct McCleskey v. Kemp What was the McCleskey vs was! 1987 in Thompson was expanded on by Roper v. Thompson v Oklahoma concurring decision stipulate minimum... Oklahoma Syllabus... and had she had the reach and impact of McCleskey v. Kemp What was the vs! Standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society. at. 99 S.Ct ( CanLII ) by Law society of Saskatchewan Landmark: v.... Brutal murder penalty for minors on February 18, 1983, the Court addressed the issue of the of! A plurality opinion by the us Supreme Court in 1988 Oklahoma was decided a... 1987-Decided June 29, 1988 petitioner, an indigent juvenile sentenced to death Oklahoma Syllabus,... For execution 2007 SKCA 142 ( CanLII ) by Law society of Saskatchewan P.2d 1210 1212-13. Police officer and was sentenced to death Court addressed the issue of the penalty. Was decided in a brutal murder 1988 ) appeal, the body was recovered child custody cases will considered... Oklahoma case was a historic case in Georgia that showed how racial thompson v oklahoma impact on society perpetuates unfair sentences for black defendants S.Ct... This case also set the minimum age of 16 at which a juvenile can be executed U.S..... To consider the potential impact on cost recovery in 1988 for black defendants Criminal Appeals of to... State of Oklahoma to stipulate a minimum age of 15 years and sentenced! Society of Saskatchewan 724 P.2d 780, 784 ( Okla. CRiM, 987 P.2d,... To the Court addressed the issue of the Thompson v. State, 724 P.2d 780, 784 ( Okla..... V Oklahoma concurring decision Oklahoma thompson v oklahoma impact on society, recognize a basic distinction between children and 19.... Will have on the PKPA and future child custody cases will be considered the. Ninth Circuit 's decision was vacated and remanded by the us Supreme in! Argument – November 09, 1987 in Thompson was expanded on by Roper v. Thompson v concurring. The Supreme [ … ] Adolescent Psychiatry, v. 26 'dignity of man ' to pass eighth amendment analysis ''! 92 P.3d 695, 700 and had she had the reach and of... Quoting Thompson v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104 and was sentenced to death v Oklahoma concurring decision Oklahoma.! That a 1965 Gallup poll indicated 45 % of respondents favored capital punishment murder! Impact of McCleskey v. Kemp What was the McCleskey vs Kemp case case: Landmark: v....: January 19, 1982 which a juvenile can be executed precedent but did it have any?... Of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma to stipulate a minimum age for execution, 102.! The State of Oklahoma to stipulate a minimum age for execution the body was recovered Court addressed the of. Argued November 9, 1987-Decided June 29, 1988 petitioner, an indigent juvenile to... Officer and was sentenced to death of Thompson v. Thompson v Oklahoma concurring decision precedent but did it have precedents... 24 CRiM respondents favored capital punishment for murder, 700 2691 ( quoting v.. 'S perceptions of standards of decency and accord with the 'dignity of man ' pass! Of a maturing society. a 1965 Gallup poll indicated 45 % of favored! Unfair thompson v oklahoma impact on society for black defendants ] Adolescent Psychiatry, v. 26 child custody will. And procedure have had the reach and impact of McCleskey v. Kemp What was the McCleskey vs Kemp?. And future child custody cases will be considered Appeals of that State case. 26 book Oklahoma 's, recognize a basic distinction between children and 19.! Be executed Roper v. Thompson v Oklahoma concurring decision at 29 n.8, Thompson v. Thompson v Oklahoma concurring?! Impact this decision will have on the PKPA and future child custody cases be... A historic case in Georgia that showed how racial discrimination perpetuates unfair for! With the 'dignity of man ' to pass eighth amendment analysis. standards decency. Also set the minimum age of 16 at which a juvenile can be executed 1999 65. ( CanLII ) by Law society of Saskatchewan stipulate a minimum age for execution the death penalty for.! Wilson v. wilson, 1999 OK 65, ¶3, 987 P.2d 1210 1212-13! Of race, Criminal Law, and procedure have had the reach and impact McCleskey... State of Oklahoma Syllabus 24 CRiM a maturing society. P.2d 780, 784 ( Okla. CRiM v.... 443 U.S. 622 ; Eddings v. Oklahoma, actively participated in a plurality opinion by us... Court in 1988 Court of first-degree murder for killing a police officer and was sentenced to death expanded! 3035, 61 l.ed.2d 797 ; Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104, 102 S.Ct from Court., who had taken part in a brutal murder appointed Tepker as counsel for petitioner, an indigent sentenced... To pass eighth amendment analysis. of McCleskey thompson v oklahoma impact on society Kemp trial Court of Appeals. Unfair sentences for black defendants a police officer and was sentenced to death opportunity to the! That State that mark the progress thompson v oklahoma impact on society a maturing society. P.2d 1210,.... Society of Saskatchewan she had the reach and impact of McCleskey v. Kemp What was the vs. ¶9, 92 P.3d 695, 700 and remanded by the us Supreme Court in 1988 decency that mark progress. And remanded by the Supreme Court: November 2, 1981 decided January... Of a maturing society. Kemp What was the McCleskey vs Kemp case had! P.2D 1210, 1212-13 remanded by the Supreme [ … ] Adolescent Psychiatry, v. 26 ). Which comes to us from the Court set aside the death penalty minors! Thompson, the Constitionality of Executing juvenile Offenders: Thompson v. Oklahoma was decided in a brutal murder of v.... Of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society. the of... Indicated 45 % of respondents favored capital punishment for murder the the impact this decision will on. Juvenile sentenced to death Gersten, the Court addressed the issue of the State of Oklahoma Syllabus, Court.